Stand up for the facts!

Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.

More Info

I would like to contribute

Florida's Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks during a debate against Democratic challenger Charlie Crist, at Sunrise Theatre, Oct. 24, 2022, in Fort Pierce, Fla. (AP) Florida's Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks during a debate against Democratic challenger Charlie Crist, at Sunrise Theatre, Oct. 24, 2022, in Fort Pierce, Fla. (AP)

Florida's Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks during a debate against Democratic challenger Charlie Crist, at Sunrise Theatre, Oct. 24, 2022, in Fort Pierce, Fla. (AP)

Yacob Reyes
By Yacob Reyes November 3, 2022

Why Ron DeSantis' claim about 'stolen land' is wrong

If Your Time is short

  • There are several historical examples of the U.S. government seizing ancestral land from Native Americans. The U.S. often acquired Native American land through dubious treaties, and later violated them to bolster expansion. 

  • The U.S. government also forcibly removed Native Americans after former President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. In Florida, more than 3,000 Native Americans were expelled from their land.

See the sources for this fact-check

As Florida's governor, Republican Ron DeSantis has repeatedly stated his conviction that leaders need to fight attempts to "indoctrinate students" in classrooms. 

In the only gubernatorial debate before the Nov. 8 election, Gov. DeSantis contrasted his record on education with that of Democratic challenger Charlie Crist and Crist's running mate Karla Hernández-Mats.

"You have people that are teaching — and actually his running mate has said this in the past — that teaching the United States was built on stolen land," DeSantis said Oct. 24. "That is inappropriate for our schools; it's not true."

We wondered what DeSantis was referring to and whether he was right in his assessment of whether the U.S. was built on "stolen land."

DeSantis' campaign did not get back to us. But his remark echoed tweets from Christina Pushaw, rapid response director for DeSantis' re-election campaign. One tweet included a screenshot of a June 24, 2018, Facebook post from United Teachers of Dade, where Hernández-Mats, a former special education teacher, has been president since 2016.   

Sign up for PolitiFact texts

The Facebook post included an image of a sign that read: "No one is illegal on stolen land." Hernández-Mats did not respond to specific questions about the image. The post was shared at a time when U.S. immigration policies were dominating the news.

We reached out to historians of Native and non-Native descent. All of them said it is well documented that the U.S. acquired Native American land through dubious treaties and, at times, forcefully confiscated ancestral territories to bolster the country's expansion. 

"As a general statement, yes, the United States stole land from Native Americans," said Philip Deloria, a Native American history professor at Harvard University.

Sometimes the U.S. and Native American tribes struck treaties that defined boundaries and determined land sale prices and forms of compensation.

Other times, tribes signed land-ceding agreements under duress. 

Featured Fact-check

Deloria said the U.S. often placed compensation for these deals in U.S.-controlled trust funds or promised payment over a number of years, but then failed to follow through.

The Sioux Agreement of 1877 is an example of the U.S. acquiring land from Native Americans through fraudulent practices and treaty violations.
 
In 1868, the U.S. signed a treaty recognizing the Black Hills, a 7-million-acre South Dakota mountain range, as part of the Great Sioux Reservation. It set the land "apart for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation" of the Sioux, a Native American tribe.
 

An image captured in 1868 shows U.S. Army Gen. William T. Sherman and Sioux leaders at Fort Laramie, Wyoming, signing a peace treaty that recognized the Black Hills as part of the Great Sioux Reservation. Its terms disintegrated after U.S. officials sought to annex the land, rumored to have gold. The event formed the basis for a 1980 Supreme Court ruling that found the U.S. had taken the tribal lands illegally. (National Archives and Records Administration)
 
The treaty between the U.S. government and the Sioux said that non-Native people "are not permitted to pass over, settle upon, or reside in the territory." Speculation that the Black Hills contained gold, however, led miners to trespass on Sioux territory. 
 
The U.S. then moved to negotiate with the Sioux to acquire the land. The deal fell through, which led to a war and hundreds of deaths. The tribe later surrendered and signed a treaty that ceded the Black Hills to the U.S. 
 
The U.S. Court of Federal Claims ruled in 1975 that the Sioux are entitled to damages of around $17 million for this land seizure. The court remarked: "A more ripe and rank case of dishonorable dealings will never, in all probability, be found in our history."
 
In 1980, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. government had acquired the Black Hills through "unfair and dishonorable dealing" and affirmed that it owed the Sioux tribe "just compensation," including interest.
 
In a dissenting opinion, Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote, "There was tragedy, deception, barbarity, and virtually every other vice known to man in the 300-year history of the expansion of the original 13 Colonies into a Nation which now embraces more than three million square miles."
 
The U.S. sometimes bought Native land from European countries, like France, and claimed ownership even though "France did not treaty with the many tribes who lived upon that land," said Randy Woodley, director of intercultural and indigenous studies at George Fox University. 
 
The federal government also forcibly removed Native Americans from their ancestral lands after former President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. That expulsion became known as the "Trail of Tears," which killed thousands of Native Americans. 
 

An image shows a page from the bill that would go on to become the Indian Removal Act of 1830. (Library of Congress)
 
The Seminoles resisted relocation, and the result was a half-century of warfare. 
 
Andrew Frank, a Florida State University professor who specializes in the history of the Seminoles, said the U.S. annexed much of Florida through treaties that a majority of the tribal leaders opposed. 
 
The U.S. military drove out more than 3,000 Seminoles from the state, according to the Florida Department of State. Around 300 members of the tribe remained in Florida. 
 
"The post-Civil War period is full of people being compressed, contained, and confined onto small reservations within their territory, in order to accommodate non-Native settlement," Deloria told PolitiFact.
 
In 1946, the federal government created the Indian Claims Commission to resolve legal claims that the U.S. obtained Native American land through questionable or fraudulent economic transactions. 
 
It lasted until 1978, and unsettled claims were transferred to the U.S. Court of Claims. The commission found that the U.S. government's payment of $152,500 to the Seminoles for about 23 million acres of land in Florida was "clearly unconscionable."
 
The Indian Claims Commission completed 546 cases, awarding about $818 million to Native American tribes.
 
"It is historically inaccurate to say the land was not stolen from Native Americans," Woodley said.
 
Our ruling 

DeSantis said it's not true that "the United States was built on stolen land."

Historians of Native and non-Native descent said DeSantis' characterization is wrong. It's well-documented that the U.S. repeatedly made treaties with Native Americans and then violated them using force and other means to accommodate non-Native settlement. Courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have time and again affirmed that as fact.

Government-endorsed actions to remove Native Americans from their ancestral lands included the 1830 passage of a federal law that led to war and resulted in thousands of Native deaths and more than 3,000 Seminoles being removed from Florida.

DeSantis' claim is wildly historically inaccurate. We rate it Pants on Fire!

Read this fact-check in Spanish.

Read About Our Process

The Principles of the Truth-O-Meter

Our Sources

Email interview with Philip Deloria, a professor of Native American history at Harvard University, Oct. 28, 2022

Email interview with Andrew Frank, a Florida State University professor who specializes in the history of the Seminoles, Nov. 1, 2022

Email interview with Randy Woodley, director of intercultural and indigenous studies at George Fox University, Nov. 2, 2022

Email interview with Delanie Bromar, spokesperson for DeSantis' campaign, Oct. 31, 2022

Email interview with Sam Ramirez, spokesperson for Crist's campaign, Oct. 28, 2022

Florida State University, "A Very Brief History of the Seminoles," accessed Oct. 28, 2022

U.S. Department of State, "Indian Treaties and the Removal Act of 1830," accessed Oct. 28, 2022

The National Archives and Records Administration, "Sioux Treaty of 1868," accessed Oct. 28, 2022

The National Archives and Records Administration, "Black Hills Treaty," accessed Oct. 28, 2022

The National Archives and Records Administration, "Treaty of Fort Laramie," accessed Oct. 28, 2022

The National Archives and Records Administration, "President Andrew Jackson's Message to Congress 'On Indian Removal’," accessed Nov. 3, 2022

Justia, "United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians," accessed Oct. 28, 2022

Merriam-Webster, "steal," accessed Oct. 28, 2022

The South Dakota State Historical Society, The Sioux Nation and Indian Territory: The Attempted Removal of 1876, accessed Oct. 28, 2022

U.S. Supreme Court, United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, accessed Oct. 28, 2022

U.S. Court of Claims, United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, accessed Oct. 28, 2022

National Geographic, The United States Government’s Relationship with Native Americans, accessed Oct. 28, 2022

Digital Public Library of America, An 1837 message from Brigadier General John E. Wool to the Cherokee Nation warning them of the consequences of resisting removal, accessed Nov. 3, 2022

American Indian: The Magazine of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of the American Indian, Nation to Nation: Treaties Between the United States and American Indian Nations, Summer/Fall 2014 issue

Browse the Truth-O-Meter

More by Yacob Reyes

Why Ron DeSantis' claim about 'stolen land' is wrong

Load more

Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!

In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.

Sign me up