Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
Fact-checking Trump’s false claim about his real estate case and land grabs in ‘communist countries’
If Your Time is short
-
New York Judge Arthur Engoron ordered former President Donald Trump to pay a $454 million bond after determining during a trial that Trump committed fraud related to his real estate valuations. An appeals court on March 25 lowered that amount to $175 million.
-
New York Attorney General Letitia James has taken the first step toward seizing Trump-owned property in Westchester County, New York, if Trump doesn’t pay the bond.
-
Unlike in communist countries, Trump had due process, including a long and public legal procedure.
-
Our mission: Help you be an informed participant in democracy. Learn more.
Former President Donald Trump compared a civil fraud judgment against him and possible plans by the New York attorney general to seize some of his property with the actions of communist dictators.
"I did nothing wrong!" Trump wrote March 22 in a Truth Social post that criticized Judge Arthur Engoron and Attorney General Letitia James. "This is simply a ‘taking.’ Much like what is done in communist countries."
Trump’s campaign spokesperson didn’t answer our request for comment.
Experts told us the civil fraud case and potential property seizure against Trump is not the same as what happens in communist countries.
Daniel Shaviro, a taxation professor at New York University School of Law, called Trump’s comparison "ludicrous" in an email to PolitiFact.
Sign up for PolitiFact texts
"He was fined as the consequence of a legal proceeding for fraud," Shaviro said.
James filed a fraud case against Trump in 2022, giving Trump "loads of time to plan for this scenario," Shaviro said. After a trial that lasted more than two months, Engoron ruled Feb. 16 that Trump had inflated the value of many of his real estate holdings to get more favorable loan and insurance terms.
The judgment was predicated on extensively documented misrepresentations by Trump, Shaviro said.
The court decision "involved legitimately adversarial legal proceedings and the rule of law (not to mention extensive evidence that was presented by the plaintiff)," Shaviro said, which makes it different from expropriations in communist countries.
James’ office filed paperwork to begin taking Trump’s assets in Westchester County, New York — where his golf course and private estate Seven Springs are — if Trump does not pay the bond.
Trump had faced a March 25 deadline to secure a bond to cover the $454 million judgment and interest as he appeals the ruling. But an appeals court on March 25 lowered that amount to $175 million and gave Trump 10 days to pay it.
Trump wrote March 25 on Truth Social, "We will abide by the decision of the Appellate Division, and post either a bond, equivalent securities, or cash."
Trump’s case is "not comparable to property seizures by a totalitarian regime, not by a long shot," said Sebastian Arcos, associate director of the Cuban Research Institute at Florida International University.
Ted Henken, a sociologist at Baruch College, City University of New York and a Cuban culture expert, said in communist countries, seizures or nationalizations of property are often focused on foreign-owned properties and are "as much assertions of economic sovereignty over key industries as they are punishments for illegal behavior." When the government seizes property owned by local residents, it does so via executive decrees that lack supporting legal procedures, a chance of defense or public transparency.
In Trump’s case, Henken said "the seizures are the result of a long and public legal procedure where he has had the ability to make his case before the law and the public."
Jorge Duany, director of Florida International University’s Cuban Research Institute, said in communist regimes "expropriation is a common strategy to ‘collectivize’ the means of production and reduce the power of independent private businesses in the transition to socialism."
In 1959, the Cuban government began to confiscate private properties, initially targeting those belonging to former dictator Fulgencio Batista and his closest allies, Duany said.
All properties in Cuba owned by U.S. residents or companies, including 21 sugar mills, utility companies and banks, were nationalized beginning in July 1960. A December 1961 law authorized the nationalization of private property belonging to all Cubans who fled the country. The expropriation process culminated in the nationalization of nearly 57,000 small private businesses on the island in 1968.
Beyond Cuba, China and the former Soviet Union enacted large-scale nationalizations of private enterprise shortly after national revolutions, Henken said. Mao Zedong, chairman of the People’s Republic of China, nationalized all private assets in the early 1950s and restricted private ownership.
Featured Fact-check
The former Soviet Union enacted extensive nationalizations starting in 1918. Some were tempered in 1922 under head of government Vladimir Lenin's New Economic Policy.
The right to own private property was eliminated and replaced with state ownership.
"The context of what (Attorney General) James is doing with Trump is completely different, narrowly targeted, and not part of any general move against the capitalist notion or right of private property," Henken said.
Trump said the New York civil fraud judgment against him and a plan to seize Trump-owned property "is simply a 'taking.' Much like what is done in communist countries."
Trump’s comparison is ridiculous.
The judge’s ruling followed a public trial that lasted more than two months; Trump had legal representation and due process. James’ plan to seize some of Trump’s property follows that.
People whose property was seized by communist regimes did not get a public trial, a chance of defense or due process. Their homes or businesses were seized as part of a widespread government effort to take over ownership of private property.
We rate this statement False.
PolitiFact Copy Chief Matthew Crowley and Researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this fact-check.
CORRECTION, March 26, 2024: A previous version of this story incorrectly referred to the judgment against Trump, which is a bond. The story has been updated.
RELATED: Fact-check: Trump calls his fraud case ‘a form of Navalny.’ That distorts the cases.
Our Sources
Donald Trump, Truth Social, March 22, 2024
Donald Trump, Truth Social, March 22, 2024
Supreme Court State of New York, Ruling by Hon. Arthur Engoron in Trump case, Feb. 16, 2024
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, Ruling in Trump case, March 25, 2024
CNN, New York Attorney General takes initial step to prepare to seize Trump assets, March 22, 2024
Cubaencuentro, La ofensiva revolucionaria de 1968, 44 años después, March 27, 2012
PolitiFact, In Context: What NY Attorney General Letitia James said about Trump that Trump’s video left out, Aug. 12, 2022
Email interview, Jorge Duany, director of the Cuban Research Institute and professor, Florida International University, March 22, 2024
Email interview, Daniel Shaviro, professor of taxation at New York University, March 22, 2024
Email interview, Sebastian A. Arcos, Associate Director. Cuban Research Institute at Florida International University, March 22, 2024
Email interview, Ted Henken, a sociologist at Baruch College, City University of New York and an expert on Cuban culture, March 22, 2024
Browse the Truth-O-Meter
More by Amy Sherman
Fact-checking Trump’s false claim about his real estate case and land grabs in ‘communist countries’
Support independent fact-checking.
Become a member!
In a world of wild talk and fake news, help us stand up for the facts.