During the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama emphasized the importance of preventing nuclear terrorism by saying that he would hold a summit in 2009 — his first year in office — "and regularly thereafter."
In 2009, we rated this promise a Compromise because the first summit was scheduled to take place a year later than Obama had pledged. But since then, summits have been held in both 2010 and 2012, and we have decided to change our rating.
The first conference was held in Washington on April 12 and 13, 2010. The second was held in Seoul, South Korea, on March 26 and 27, 2012.
Not all nuclear arms-control advocates were satisfied with the outcome of the 2012 conclave -- the editors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists had a somewhat pessimistic assessment -- but more directly relevant to Obama's promise, the meetings have become institutionalized on a once-every-two-years basis, including a 2014 summit scheduled to be held in the Netherlands.
Matthew Bunn, an associate professor of public policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, says the one-year delay is less significant than the fact that two summits have been held and a third has been scheduled. We rate this a Promise Kept.
Stand up for the facts!
Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy.
We need your help.
I would like to contribute
← Back to Convene a summit on preventing nuclear terrorism
Two summits on preventing nuclear terrorism held, one scheduled for 2014
Our Sources
State Department, "Key Facts about the Nuclear Security Summit," April 2010
State Department, "Key Facts on the 2012 Seoul Nuclear Security Summit," March 2012
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, "2012 Nuclear Security Summit: What it was and wasn't," March 30, 2012
Arms Control Today, "Dutch to Host '14 Nuclear Security Summit," March 2012
Email interview with Matthew Bunn, an associate professor of public policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, Nov. 5, 2012